Memory Corner
2. On the Porch One Hot Night
Welcome, Dear Readers, to Dark Entertainment Trends. We plan to cover all media for music, books, art, and photography. Our blog here will serve as a venue for new poetry, essays, short stories, and more. We don't define what "dark" means. We leave that to you creatives out there to share your thoughts on the matter. Again, welcome.
Memory Corner
2. On the Porch One Hot Night
Memory Corner
1. The Incinerator
I barely remember the Projects incinerators being used. By the 1960s, they were replaced by the Sanitation Department, you know, the Garbage Men. But these useless buildings had their purpose for those in need. If you pried the door open, it served as a hiding place to do your drugs or to make out with your lover on a makeshift bed. For kids, it was a castle to defend. We climbed on top and challenged the other kids to dethrone us. We usually played in the late evening, after dinner and TV. We'd watch our shows like Star Trek and Outer Limits, then our parents would take over the set to watch their shows. That's when we gathered by the castle.
The projects were four-unit apartments that were placed around the Incinerator like four dominoes surrounding the cabin-like structure, which served as the trash disposal for the 16 families in the apartments. When the garbage Men started collecting the trash from the dumpsters that were placed next to each project, serving four units, four families. The incinerators were abandoned, ignored. Burning trash was no longer safe, the project managers said. Thus the concrete structures became our playground.
Many parents scolded their kids for playing on the "unsafe" incinerators. We told them, They're unsafe only when the maintenance men lit them up. They don't do that anymore. They're old, cold chimney stacks. If the managers don't tear them down, then it's okay to play on them. If they weren't safe, they'd tear them down. This logic worked on our folks. They bought it, and we played castle in peace.
One day, Reys, the high school football captain sat on the porch by the unit where he lived and watched us play. When we saw him, we all ran over to the football hero and asked what University he was going to. He said he had a few choices, and a few years to decide. One of the older boys, the Middle School kid, asked Reys to join us. He could be King of the Castle, and we'd try to dethrone him. He knew how the game was played, so he accepted. He leaped and grabbed the ledge of the incinerator roof. He pulled himself up in one try. It usually took us kids, even the older ones, at least three tries to climb on the roof.
And the game began. Reys stood atop the roof, while several of us kids tried to climb the walls to reach up to pull the football star off the roof. It was his job to keep us from getting on the roof. He simply had to pry our fingers off the ledge of the roof or push the older boys off before they could hoist themselves up. Reys was winning quite easily for several minutes. We were dropping off the incinerators, landing on the grass, leaping back to our feet to try again. There was laughter and moans, until there was silence.
No one could remember what happened. The game just stopped. The police came. An ambulance. No one asked us kids any questions. Reys' mom told the police he fell off the incinerator. The medic told his mom that her son had injured his neck. The ambulance carried the football hero off. The police put their notepads away and drove off. Reys' mom was crying when she went back inside her unit. We didn't talk about it. We just went home.
About three weeks later, his mom brought Reys home. He stayed inside for about a week. When he finally emerged from the unit, none of the kids wanted to engage with him. After some hemming and hawing, he approached me. I didn't know what to say. I couldn't remember anything about that night. But he didn't ask anything. He smiled and sat next to me. "The sky is blue today," he said. "I like the sky when it's blue."
It took me a second to realize that his voice sounded more like a first grader's than a high schooler's. "How's the football team doing?" I asked. "I dunno," he tried to explain. "It's too far away now. I might get lost." We sat and talked about nothing really for over an hour. It wasn't until his mom called him in for supper that he got up to leave. "Thank you for talking to me. You're the first."
That summer, I liked to help Reys with his homework from his new school. His mom often invited me in to lunch with him and watch cartoons. And the sad thing was, No one ever talked about any of it. And as if to erase the memory of the tragedy, the Projects Manager in charge had the incinerator torn down. No flowers were planted there. No plaque was placed there. The concrete base remained, and no kids ever played there again.
Gary Numan at the Santa Ana Observatory
April 10, 2026
What you can expect from the Gary Numan concert is not nostagia, but good music, an inventive light show, and an adoring crowd. Rather than lean of an oldies setlist of hits, the band brought a cabaret of decadence and industrial decay. What? Hear me out. Most casual listeners who hear the name Gary Numan think "Cars", that international hit from the late '70s. They usually add, Whatever happened to him? Well, he experimented with with Synth Rock, Industrial Metal, collaborated with artists from Siouxsie Sioux (Siouxsie and the Banshees) to Robert Fripp (King Crimson), and eventually incorporated all those sounds into one big sound, sort of an Industrial Synch, to play all his setlist songs with. Whether it's Cars from 1979's The Pleasure Principle, or Love Hurt Bleed from 2013's Splinter, it was set to Industrial Synch, and it was a perfect fit, as it it were written to be played that way.
Add to that the brilliant light show, with each song getting its own version of light, shadow, and darkness. From strobes to color saturation, no song had the same lighting. Which brings us to the "caberet" setting. Those lyrics, the poses against the strobe lights, the sensual interplay between the bassist and the guitarist. It was confusing enough that they both were the same shape and height, wore the same black outfits, and had shaved heads, but when they squirmed together like a caduceus, it was had to tell who was who. And Gary Numan played the perfect host, letting his songs do the talking.
I saw this line-up earlier this year open for Robby Krieger and loved the show so much, I wanted to see them play the headliner role. But this time out, the crowd was there for Gary Numan. They knew about his evolution from Synch Rock to Industrial Synch and showed up to enjoy it. Every time Gary Numan paused to take a swig of water, the crowd roared his name over and over. It was that kind of show. Modern. No one came for the nostalgia. It was about the evolution of that artist named Gary Numan, and we just wanted to be there to be a part of it.
The Non-Review
F. Paul Wilson crafted five stories that coalesced to create a single story, which we've come to know as the Adversary Cycle. However, even after the cycle completed, Paul found spaces between the stories where he could fit more stories. Nightworld initially concluded the cycle with an end of the world scenario: Monsters crawl from a giant hole in the Earth to wreak havoc on the population. As a fan of the AC, I often wondered about the possible stories that never reached the pages of the AC, the stories of the secondary characters whose timeline was never resolved or mentioned again. I even considered writing a fan fiction about a certain bartender who along with his patrons defend the bar against an onslaught of creature, big and small. Well, instead of wrapping up loose ends on the AC, Paul has created new characters to fill a space right before Nightworld. So, is this canon or fan-fiction?
Let's talk about this.
In the subatomic world of particles, quantum physics is always finding new quanta, combinations of particles that intertwine to a point where something new is created, being neither one nor the other, but both at once where one can't determine which was which before they combined. In other words, the five ,books by F. Paul Wilson, The Keep, The Touch, Reborn, Reprisal, and Nightworld, (referred to as the Adversary Cycle) may have been a done deal at the start, but these stories have combined to create "quanta", new stories that occupy the spaces between books, but are not either book; they are something new. But where does it stop? Because within the new are ever-emerging quanta, ad infinitum.
Between this book and that book, we got a new book that sort of combines those books into a whole new story, while continuing the old book and foreshadowing the following book. Not that the stories are bad. Actually, they're good. F. Paul Wilson is a master at spinning several plates in the air with one hand while typing a new quanta on his laptop. Forgive the mixed metaphors.
Let's continue.
The minutia of plots within plots is never-ending. As long as stories can fit between the spaces of other stories, the original story cannot end. Such then do we find ourselves with Signalz. There is still quantum space enough between Signalz and Nightworld for several more books. If there were enough time and inspiration. Ah, if only Paul were as immortal as his muse.
Sky Tongues (2011) by Gina Ranalli
Reviewed by Anthony Servante
Welcome once again to the darkness with your host, Anthony Servante. In this, our sixth venture into horror, the grotesque, and their various branches of literary genres, we explore the ‘absurd’ and “Bizarro Literature” today. We will analyze “Sky Tongues” by Gina Ranalli and deconstruct its elements of absurdism and try to define the term ‘bizarro’ as it applies to literature. Right off, let me say that today’s use of the word, ‘absurd’, as ridiculous or exaggerated, is not the philosophical definition I am discussing here, where it is closer to ‘meaninglessness’ or nihilism, but when combined with the comically ironic that relies on a suspension of disbelief, it becomes bizarre. Quite simply, Sky Tongues, the character, is real in a bizarre universe that we can enter and share when we don’t accept it as real or validate its existence. But we can visit anytime just by opening the pages of Ranalli’s book again and again.
Let’s begin with Albert Camus, who helped define absurdism in his existentialist writings. He stresses that the absurd is the realization that the universe is without order, that man’s quest for meaning is endless and futile. He says, “The Absurd arises out of the fundamental disharmony between the individual's search for meaning and the apparent meaninglessness of the universe” (Wikipedia). But Philip Thompson in The Critical Idiom series, The Grotesque (1972), clarifies that Camus believes that in the ‘search’ for meaning, there is meaning; the journey, not the destination, is real, and the opposite of real is absurdity, such as one finding meaning in religion, love or in just being alive (suicide for Camus is not a solution for meaninglessness as suicide itself is an absurdity). So, let’s clarify. Absurdity is that which does not make sense, but the quest for truth in absurdity is valid, as long as answers are not reached. Thus, the question: Does life have meaning? is not limited to answering yes or no. We can simply recognize the question itself as absurd and consider other answers in addition to the negative or positive, including the grotesque possibilities, such as life is but a dream or nightmare.
The ‘bizarre’, Thompson notes, is the disharmonic elements clashing, similar to his definition of ‘the grotesque’ but with an absurd apportionment; the grotesque is revolting and frightening, but the bizarre is “eerie and comical”. Camus sums up the balance in this disharmony as freedom from a need for harmony: “By accepting the Absurd, one can achieve absolute freedom, and that by recognizing no religious or other moral constraints and by revolting against the Absurd while simultaneously accepting it as unstoppable, one could possibly be content from the personal meaning constructed in the process.” To embrace the bizarre liberates the subjective need for order. It becomes an ongoing process, a journey, a progression.
Thus Bizarro Literature must include elements in conflict but in subjective harmony and acceptance. Consider the world of animation. In the movie, Who Framed Roger Rabbit? (1988), Eddie Valiant’s brother is killed by a piano being dropped on him in Toontown, but when Eddie visits the animated town, and rides the lightning quick elevator operated by Droopy, he is flattened like a pancake at the bottom of the elevator floor, like a cartoon. Why isn’t he killed by the flattening? His brother was killed by a cartoon piano. Are the physical rules of Toontown variant? Do they apply differently to different people or are they constant? One could argue that in a cartoon world, there are no rules, and therein lies the crux of the matter. To find order in a cartoon is to give absurdity validity. To argue that toons can or cannot kill is a fallacy begging a conclusion. We are talking Roger Rabbit, folks. There is no answer, but seeking one gives one a greater enjoyment of the movie, itself a disharmony with its animated characters and the real actors blended into the same story. When we suspend our disbelief, the disharmony becomes harmonic and subjectively entertaining, but objectively, it is bizarre—just as bizarre as if Roger Rabbit, or better yet, Jessica Rabbit, walked right into the room like any flesh and blood creature or person and interacted with you. Some may be amazed, others horrified.
Which brings us to Sky Tongues by Gina Ranalli. The novel is a series of disharmonious elements coalescing into a bizarre world where we find ourselves accepting the absurdities as subjectively valid as we would a novel with harmonious elements. For instance, in Peyton Place (1956), “the main plot follows the lives of three women—lonely and repressed Constance MacKenzie; her illegitimate daughter Allison; and her employee Selena Cross, a girl from across the tracks, or "from the shacks." The novel describes how they come to terms with their identity as women and sexual beings in a small New England town. Hypocrisy, social inequities and class privilege are recurring themes in a tale that includes incest, abortion, adultery, lust and murder” (Wiki). We do not question such goings on in the “soap opera” town; we accept it without question, but when we approach the same themes in a world where disharmony reigns, the absurd is the standard, and to question it itself becomes absurd. To accept it is to accept the bizarre and its rules of chaos, an oxymoron in essence.